Re: Checksum filterable fields

[Christopher Maynard <Christopher.Maynard () gtech com>]

Christopher Maynard <Christopher.Maynard@...> writes:

> Removing the bad_checksums does have at least 1 drawback though, and that's
> that several of them are used in default coloring rules, so if they're
> removed, users will likely end up with several warnings of the form:
>
> Warn Could not compile color filter "Checksum Errors" from saved filters:
> "<protocol>.checksum_bad" is neither a field nor a protocol name.

I suppose in order to avoid that, the <protocol>.checksum_good's could be
removed instead of the <protocol>.checksum_bad's, since none of those are
used in any of the default coloring rules.


___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe