Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Jurassic packets


From: ronnie sahlberg <ronniesahlberg () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 13:27:23 -0700

Can you try loading an NFS trace on it?

I recall that in the old days,  sniffers usually could not decode the
NFS replies since they did not keep enough state around between
request/response to identify what kind of response packet it was.



On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Gerald Combs <gerald () wireshark org> wrote:
For Monday's Sharkfest keynote I wanted to show everyone what things
looked like back in the early days of the project. After doing
unspeakable things to a Red Hat 6.2 VM I managed to get a copy of
Ethereal 0.2.0 up and running. Screenshot attached.

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: