Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Dissector question
From: Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 13:30:48 -0400
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 1:24 PM, David Arnold <davida () pobox com> wrote:
On 10/03/2013, at 5:13 PM, Evan Huus wrote: Hi Evan, Thanks for your help. <...>I'm not sure I follow this. Can't you simply store the most recent sequence number in the conversation struct, and increment it for each PDU received?I tried to do this, and perhaps I just got it (slightly) wrong. In my foo_dissect() function, I looked up the conversation, grabbed the latest sequence number, incremented it, and wrote it back to the conversation. I displayed it in the tree_item for the PDU, and in the COL_INFO, which was basically what I was after. The issues I had seemed to be related to when my dissection function was called: if I scrolled from start to end of the capture, it was fine. If I jumped to the final frame, the sequence number wasn't incremented for the intervening PDUs. Perhaps I need it to be done outside my if (tree) { ... } ?
Yes, definitely. In general, the only things done in an if (tree) block should be adding things to the tree. Any other tasks (setting column information, reassembly, conversation management, etc.) should be done regardless. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Dissector question David Arnold (Mar 10)
- Re: Dissector question Evan Huus (Mar 10)
- Re: Dissector question David Arnold (Mar 10)
- Re: Dissector question Evan Huus (Mar 10)
- Re: Dissector question mmann78 (Mar 10)
- Re: Dissector question David Arnold (Mar 11)
- Re: Dissector question David Arnold (Mar 10)
- Re: Dissector question Evan Huus (Mar 10)