Wireshark mailing list archives
Warning on useless extended value strings?
From: Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:09:53 -0400
Would anyone object to a g_warning if an extended value string has to fall back to linear search? It probably indicates either a typo in the value-string or somebody not understanding how extended value strings work. Didn't want to put this in without asking because if there is a reason I'm not aware of it would cause a ton of fuzz failures. Evan P.S. I thought of this while digging around thinking about https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8467 - I'm still technically waiting for the original reporter to ACK it, but if anyone else has feedback it would be appreciated. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Warning on useless extended value strings? Evan Huus (Mar 18)
- Re: Warning on useless extended value strings? Pascal Quantin (Mar 19)
- Re: Warning on useless extended value strings? Evan Huus (Mar 19)
- Re: Warning on useless extended value strings? Anders Broman (Mar 19)
- Re: Warning on useless extended value strings? Evan Huus (Mar 19)
- Re: Warning on useless extended value strings? Evan Huus (Mar 19)
- Re: Warning on useless extended value strings? Pascal Quantin (Mar 19)