Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Bug 8416 - remove C++ incompatibilities from packet-pw-atm.c
From: Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 08:14:12 -0500
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:14 AM, Anders Broman <a.broman () bredband net> wrote:
Evan Huus skrev 2013-03-01 03:50:On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Ed Beroset <beroset () mindspring com> wrote:Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all nl>What I would like to see is the abolishment of the pwc_packet_properties_t type altogether. This is _not_ an enum.I agree, and have come across another such "enum abuse" instance that may be harder to address. Specifically, in the header file gmessages.h there is a similar typedef enum called GLogLevelFlags which is also intended to provide names for bitflags rather than actually enumerate. This construct is used a number of places in the Wireshark code (such as line 3169 of plugins/asn1/packet-asn1.c). Adding a cast quiets the compiler, but is there a better way that doesn't require rewriting glib-2.0? mylogh = g_log_set_handler (NULL, GLogLevelFlags(G_LOG_LEVEL_MASK | G_LOG_FLAG_FATAL | G_LOG_FLAG_RECURSION), my_log_handler, NULL); EdNot off the top of my head. Fortunately, the vast majority of G_LOG_LEVEL_* uses are in g_log calls that shouldn't cause problems - there are only five or six cases I noticed where we were doing bit-fieldy things with them.On a side note, does any one know how to regenerate the PIDL dissectors? there is a potential fix in the template waiting for regeneration.
I think there is an epan/dissectors/pidl/README, though I have never verified the instruction in it. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: Bug 8416 - remove C++ incompatibilities from packet-pw-atm.c Evan Huus (Mar 01)