Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 46513: /trunk/ /trunk/doc/: dumpcap.pod tshark.pod /trunk/: dumpcap.c tshark.c
From: Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 15:58:58 -0400
On 2013-03-27, at 2:21 PM, "Maynard, Chris" <Christopher.Maynard () gtech com> wrote:
Wireshark's current "goto packet" option could be moved from "-g" to "-G", but then Wireshark's new "-G" (goto packet) will be different from tshark's "-G" (reports). Should Wireshark also be able to generate reports? If so, then we should reserve "-G" for that purpose and move "goto packet" to something else; if not, then we can use "-G".
I don't think Wireshark needs to be able to generate that kind of report from the CLI as long as it's available from the GUI (which I think it is?) In general, if tshark has a flag for something available in the Wireshark GUI, Wireshark doesn't need the same flag.
- Chris ________________________________________ From: wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org [wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Evan Huus [eapache () gmail com] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 9:22 PM To: Developer support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 46513: /trunk/ /trunk/doc/: dumpcap.pod tshark.pod /trunk/: dumpcap.c tshark.c Presumably "goto packet" should be moved to -G so that -g is consistent across all the tools. On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Maynard, Chris <Christopher.Maynard () gtech com> wrote:"-G" for Wireshark? - Chris ________________________________________ From: wireshark-commits-bounces () wireshark org [wireshark-commits-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of morriss () wireshark org [morriss () wireshark org] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 9:07 PM To: wireshark-commits () wireshark org Subject: [Wireshark-commits] rev 46513: /trunk/ /trunk/doc/: dumpcap.pod tshark.pod /trunk/: dumpcap.c tshark.c http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=46513 User: morriss Date: 2012/12/11 06:07 PM Log: Document the "-g" option to dumpcap. Add that option to tshark, too, and document it. The option can't be given to Wireshark because the GUI already has a "-g" (goto packet). Directory: /trunk/doc/ Changes Path Action +7 -0 dumpcap.pod Modified +7 -0 tshark.pod Modified Directory: /trunk/ Changes Path Action +1 -1 dumpcap.c Modified +2 -0 tshark.c Modified-- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this email message is intended only for use of the intended recipient. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender by replying to this email. Thank you. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 46513: /trunk/ /trunk/doc/: dumpcap.pod tshark.pod /trunk/: dumpcap.c tshark.c Maynard, Chris (Mar 27)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 46513: /trunk/ /trunk/doc/: dumpcap.pod tshark.pod /trunk/: dumpcap.c tshark.c Evan Huus (Mar 27)