Re: [Wireshark-dev] GSOC ideas: protocol buffers dissector andFileshark

[okordy <okordy () o2 pl>]

From: <Michal.Labedzki () tieto com>
> I guess current file dissectors are ok (they are only not complete). I propose start work on Fileshark by write 
> simple file dissector for Wireshark. You meet dissector API and Wireshark. For example: *.bmp
> It sometimes used on webpages, so it is in Wireshark scope. Also you will be able to add "Preview" to Wireshark (new 
> tab like reassemble tabs? shows only when click image dissector?).

I'm already familiar with dissector API, so I don't think it would be any problem. I also think that "Preview" feature 
would be really useful, so I mentioned about it in a comment to my GSoC proposal.

> I will be happy to see only one tool, not two separated tools. I hope current executable can be extended.

Keeping Wireshark as one tool would be definitely best solution for me. I think it could be done.

> By the way, if you want some help, feel free to contact with me.
>
> Pozdrawiam / Best regards

I've missed this mail previously, so I'm sorry that I'm replying so late.

Pozdrawiam,
okordy
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe