Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Future of glib?
From: Gerald Combs <gerald () wireshark org>
Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 13:42:25 -0800
On 11/3/13 12:54 PM, Roland Knall wrote:
Hi Just a short question. If the long-term goal is to switch to Qt, what ist the long-term plan for glib? As of now, many dissectors use the data types, tables, etc. Should they be replaced with Qt calls, default datatypes (e.g. guint16 => uint16_t, ...) ? What is the course here?
I don't think GLib will go away any time soon. It provides a lot of useful functionality and as you point out Wireshark uses it all over the place. It also doesn't require switching anything outside of ui/qt to C++. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Future of glib? Roland Knall (Nov 03)
- Re: Future of glib? Gerald Combs (Nov 03)
- Re: Future of glib? Roland Knall (Nov 03)
- Re: Future of glib? Gerald Combs (Nov 03)
- Re: Future of glib? Roland Knall (Nov 03)
- Re: Future of glib? Joerg Mayer (Nov 03)
- Re: Future of glib? Gerald Combs (Nov 03)