Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors


From: Matthieu Patou <mat () samba org>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 16:26:00 -0700

On 10/21/2013 12:48 PM, mmann78 () netscape net wrote:

Checked most of the patches into r52744 (http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=52744)
Didn't integrate
0010-frsrpc-Regenerate-frsrpc-due-to-changes-in-the-pidl-.patch
0016-Regenerate-the-dnserver.patch

due to compile errors on Windows from applying the patch in bug 9301 
(https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9301).

See r52735 (http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=52735) for how it was fixed.  Not sure if the 
PIDL compiler has to be changed for this one.
Can you tell me what were the compile errors on linux, it's seems just fine with just this patch on top of the recent svn trunk.

I just have warnings for dnsserver:
/home/mat/workspace/wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-dcerpc-dnsserver.c: In function ‘dnsserver_dissect_element_DNS_RPC_RECORD_Type’: /home/mat/workspace/wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-dcerpc-dnsserver.c:1381:2: warning: passing argument 7 of ‘dnsserver_dissect_enum_DNS_RECORD_TYPE’ from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default] /home/mat/workspace/wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-dcerpc-dnsserver.c:1008:1: note: expected ‘guint32 *’ but argument is of type ‘guint16 *’ /home/mat/workspace/wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-dcerpc-dnsserver.c: At top level: /home/mat/workspace/wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-dcerpc-dnsserver.c:1261:1: warning: ‘dnsserver_dissect_element_DNS_RPC_NAME_NameLength’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function] /home/mat/workspace/wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-dcerpc-dnsserver.c:1269:1: warning: ‘dnsserver_dissect_element_DNS_RPC_NAME_Name’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function] /home/mat/workspace/wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-dcerpc-dnsserver.c:1276:1: warning: ‘dnsserver_dissect_element_DNS_RPC_NAME_Name_’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]

Matthieu
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
            mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: