Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors
From: Matthieu Patou <mat () samba org>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 16:26:00 -0700
On 10/21/2013 12:48 PM, mmann78 () netscape net wrote:
Can you tell me what were the compile errors on linux, it's seems just fine with just this patch on top of the recent svn trunk.Checked most of the patches into r52744 (http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=52744)Didn't integrate0010-frsrpc-Regenerate-frsrpc-due-to-changes-in-the-pidl-.patch 0016-Regenerate-the-dnserver.patch due to compile errors on Windows from applying the patch in bug 9301 (https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9301). See r52735 (http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=52735) for how it was fixed. Not sure if the PIDL compiler has to be changed for this one.
I just have warnings for dnsserver:/home/mat/workspace/wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-dcerpc-dnsserver.c: In function ‘dnsserver_dissect_element_DNS_RPC_RECORD_Type’: /home/mat/workspace/wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-dcerpc-dnsserver.c:1381:2: warning: passing argument 7 of ‘dnsserver_dissect_enum_DNS_RECORD_TYPE’ from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default] /home/mat/workspace/wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-dcerpc-dnsserver.c:1008:1: note: expected ‘guint32 *’ but argument is of type ‘guint16 *’ /home/mat/workspace/wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-dcerpc-dnsserver.c: At top level: /home/mat/workspace/wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-dcerpc-dnsserver.c:1261:1: warning: ‘dnsserver_dissect_element_DNS_RPC_NAME_NameLength’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function] /home/mat/workspace/wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-dcerpc-dnsserver.c:1269:1: warning: ‘dnsserver_dissect_element_DNS_RPC_NAME_Name’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function] /home/mat/workspace/wireshark/epan/dissectors/packet-dcerpc-dnsserver.c:1276:1: warning: ‘dnsserver_dissect_element_DNS_RPC_NAME_Name_’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
Matthieu ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors, (continued)
- Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors Guy Harris (Oct 07)
- Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors ronnie sahlberg (Oct 07)
- Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors Guy Harris (Oct 07)
- Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors Joerg Mayer (Oct 07)
- Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors Guy Harris (Oct 07)
- Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors Matthieu Patou (Oct 08)
- Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors Joerg Mayer (Oct 21)
- Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors Matthieu Patou (Oct 26)
- Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors Matthieu Patou (Oct 27)
- Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors mmann78 (Oct 27)
- Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors Matthieu Patou (Oct 28)