Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: VALS() with populated "unknown string"


From: Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames-ws () darkjames pl>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 19:43:36 +0200

On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 06:47:50AM -0400, mmann78 () netscape net wrote:
Is there a way to provide the "unknown string" for the val_to_str call made in hf_ registration (ie some derivation 
of the VALS() macro)?
There are many proto_tree_add_[u]int_format[_value] calls that are done strictly to provided an "unknown string" for 
the val_to_str that is different than the default of "Unknown". 
If there was such a way, many of these calls could be converted to proto_tree_add_item or proto_tree_add_[u]int.

If there isn't such a thing, how easy/hard would it be to implement?

I'd suggest tweaking extended value_string API for it.

We'd need first to convert value_string to extended one, but I think
it's better than adding new field to header_field_info structure.

Regards,
Jakub.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: