Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Gently migrating to Git + Gerrit


From: Graham Bloice <graham.bloice () trihedral com>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 10:15:38 +0100

On 20 September 2013 08:04, Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin () gmail com> wrote:

2013/9/20 Gerald Combs <gerald () wireshark org>

If I understand correctly, the main difference between Chocolatey
packages and NuGet packages from our perspective is that the former are
installed in system-wide locations (primarily %ProgramFiles%) and the
latter are installed in the local source directory. Which would be
preferable for building Wireshark on Windows?


On my side I would prefer having a system-wide location if I can avoid
putting more stuff in my %ProgramFiles% folder as my system disk is filling
way too fast. Do we have the possibility to change the target folder (like
the WIRESHARK_LIB_DIR environment variable we have today)?


I believe the Chocolatey install script in a package can put the files in
any location, they just have defaults.  Chocolatey is a machine-wide
package manager and NuGet seems to be more focused on libraries for
specific apps, hence targeting the app source directory.

We have a mix of requirements, the (possibly machine-wide) infrastructure
(VS, cygwin, python, CMake??, etc.) and then the libraries to link with
(gtk, glib, qt etc.) so I'm not certain which tool is best, but it would
seem that as Chocolatey has a wider range than NuGet it may be more
appropriate.

I still haven't looked into CoApp yet.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: