Re: qtshark startup time ~1 minute just printing messages

[Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>]

On 2013-09-10, at 12:58 AM, Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de> wrote:

> Hello Evan,
>
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 09:08:59PM -0400, Evan Huus wrote:
> > It should be fixed in r51914 (see the commit message for more details).
> > Joerg, please let me know if it now works for you (or if you are in fact
> > seeing a different bug).
>
> Fixed.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Now that it is working, the only question left is: What's the use case for
> this progress bar?

Not sure, Gerald probably knows the answer. I think probably just to provide an indication that it's not stuck on much 
slower machines where startup (especially with a cold cache) can take a nontrivial amount of time.

>    Jörg
> -- 
> Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer () loplof de>
> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
> works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe