Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: How can Wireshark improve
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 12:36:18 -0700
On Apr 25, 2014, at 10:02 AM, ronnie sahlberg <ronniesahlberg () gmail com> wrote:
Yes. I think in most cases you want to split packet relations up into two buckets : "packets are related because they form a request/reply (and or cancel) pair" and "packets are related for some other reason". We could fix this by changing all request/response fields to a new FT_REQUEST_REPONSE type.
"Request/response fields" in the sense of "fields used to match requests and responses" (such as ONC RPC XIDs), or "request/response fields" in the sense of "for a {request,response}, the frame number of the corresponding {response,request}"? If the latter, presumably you mean using FT_REQUEST_RESPONSE (or perhaps FT_MATCHING_REQUEST and FT_MATCHING_RESPONSE) rather than FT_FRAMENUM. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- How can Wireshark improve Richard Sharpe (Apr 19)
- Re: How can Wireshark improve Guy Harris (Apr 19)
- Re: How can Wireshark improve Hadriel Kaplan (Apr 21)
- Re: How can Wireshark improve Richard Sharpe (Apr 21)
- Re: How can Wireshark improve Jeff Morriss (Apr 22)
- Re: How can Wireshark improve Jaap Keuter (Apr 24)
- Re: How can Wireshark improve Richard Sharpe (Apr 24)
- Re: How can Wireshark improve ronnie sahlberg (Apr 25)
- Re: How can Wireshark improve Gerald Combs (Apr 25)
- Re: How can Wireshark improve Guy Harris (Apr 25)
- Re: How can Wireshark improve Jeff Morriss (Apr 25)
- Re: How can Wireshark improve Guy Harris (Apr 19)