Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: overriding dissector for port 8080
From: Hadriel Kaplan <hadriel.kaplan () oracle com>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 10:19:52 -0400
On Apr 4, 2014, at 9:56 AM, John Dill <John.Dill () greenfieldeng com> wrote:
I also noticed a disabled_protos.[ch], so maybe there is a feature to disable other protocols. Is there a feature that could be used to hide protocols I don't need in the Filter Expression (to reduce the list to simplify the interface to users)?No, I don't think there's a way to simplify what's in the Filter Expression dialog short of removing dissectors from Wireshark (probably more effort than it's worth).The only reason would be to simplify the interface for test engineers who like to streamline their process (it would remove the need to constantly type the protocol abbreviation). It would happen at the end of the development cycle if at all.
Can’t you just create some filter macros [1] to do that for you? [1] http://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsug_html_chunked/ChDisplayFilterMacrosSection.html -hadriel ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- overriding dissector for port 8080 John Dill (Apr 03)
- Re: overriding dissector for port 8080 Alexis La Goutte (Apr 03)
- Re: overriding dissector for port 8080 Jeff Morriss (Apr 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: overriding dissector for port 8080 John Dill (Apr 04)
- Re: overriding dissector for port 8080 Hadriel Kaplan (Apr 04)
- Re: overriding dissector for port 8080 John Dill (Apr 04)
- Re: overriding dissector for port 8080 Hadriel Kaplan (Apr 04)
- Re: overriding dissector for port 8080 John Dill (Apr 04)