Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Possible change to packet-ssl.c?
From: Peter Wu <lekensteyn () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 10:17:57 +0200
On Wednesday 09 April 2014 16:49:43 Guy Harris wrote:
Why is that treated as a "this is encrypted" indication rather than a "somebody's trying to extract whatever's in the server's memory after the request payload" indication?
After the handshake, the record layer is encrypted, including heartbeats. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Possible change to packet-ssl.c? Guy Harris (Apr 09)
- Re: Possible change to packet-ssl.c? Evan Huus (Apr 09)
- Re: Possible change to packet-ssl.c? Peter Wu (Apr 10)