Re: building a Gtk2 RPM (Was: QT_MIN_VERSION)

[Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws () gmail com>]

On 08/12/14 16:05, Christopher Maynard wrote:
> Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws@...> writes:
> > Note that the %bcond_with* macros are funny; they don't really do what
> > you'd expect:
> >
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-December/160357.html
>
> Thanks for the link.  Yes, I was mistaken in my understanding of these
> macros, but since I explicitly specified the configure options for gtk2,
> gtk3 and qt, I don't think it mattered.  Well, I restored wireshark.spec.in
> to its original state and tried again with the same negative results as
> before:
>
> ./configure --with-gtk2 && make rpm-package
>
> ...
> RPM build errors:
>      File not found:
> /home/wireshark/1.12.0/packaging/rpm/BUILDROOT/wireshark-1.12.0-1.x86_64
> /usr/local/bin/wireshark-qt
> make: *** [rpm-package] Error 1

That's odd; I just tried it (starting from the wireshark-1.12.0 source 
tarball[1]) and did not have any problems.  I wonder if your 
wireshark.spec file isn't being regenerated (from wireshark.spec.in)? 
You could try comparing the two or just remove wireshark.spec to force 
it to be built again.

[1] cd /tmp && tar xjf /path/to/wireshark-1.12.0.tar.bz2 && cd 
wireshark-1.12.0 && ./configure --with-gtk2 && make rpm-package

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
            mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe