Re: [Wireshark-commits] master 1194061: clear the temporary components of usb_conv_info_t before we dissect a new packet

[Martin Kaiser <lists () kaiser cx>]

> Frankly, conversation structures shouldn't have per-packet data in
> them at all; this was probably the easiest way to fix the fuzz
> failure, but it really seems odd to me that it even needs to be done.

> Thoughts?

True. Per-packet data shouldn't be part of the conversation struct. I'm
working step by step to refactor the USB dissectors, this will be
addressed at some point (as time permits).
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe