Re: Should labels in the tree view for the 802.11ad dissector additions conform to the spec?

[Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe () gmail com>]

Oops, screen shot now attached ...

On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Anders Broman
<anders.broman () ericsson com> wrote:
> From: wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org
> [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Richard Sharpe
> Sent: den 25 augusti 2014 00:06
> To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Should labels in the tree view for the 802.11ad
> dissector additions conform to the spec?
>
>
>
> Hi folks,
>
>
>
> I notice, as in the attached screen shot, that the 802.11ad dissector
> additions label the field that the spec (available for free from
> http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/download/802.11ad-2012.pdf) calls the
> Control Frame Extension simply as the Extension.
>
>
>
> While it could be considered obvious, I tend to believe that it should
> conform fully to the spec.
>
>
>
> Any thoughts?
>
>
>
> Although no screen shot attached, I agree using the name from the spec is
> the way to go.
>
> Regards
>
> Anders
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe



-- 
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂？唯有杜康。--曹操)

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe