Wireshark mailing list archives
The recent changes to proto.c appear to have broken things badly ...
From: Bill Meier <wmeier () newsguy com>
Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2014 23:20:20 -0400
Specifically:For some/many/all? dissectors, the protocol never appears in the 'protocol' column', isn't in the list of protos, filters for the protocol don't work. etc etc
I guess something fails with respect to the proto_tree_add_item(..., proto_..., ...) call.Oddly enough, the actual dissection for the protocol does appear in the details pane.
I believe the changes (5460d7f & 3da89d6) should be reverted until they are properly tested/fixed.
(When i reverted these two commits to proto.c, things were OK again. Bill ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- The recent changes to proto.c appear to have broken things badly ... Bill Meier (Aug 03)
- Re: The recent changes to proto.c appear to have broken things badly ... Evan Huus (Aug 03)
- Re: The recent changes to proto.c appear to have broken things badly ... Bill Meier (Aug 03)
- Re: The recent changes to proto.c appear to have broken things badly ... Jeff Morriss (Aug 04)
- Re: The recent changes to proto.c appear to have broken things badly ... Anders Broman (Aug 04)
- Re: The recent changes to proto.c appear to have broken things badly ... Evan Huus (Aug 03)