Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Acp 142 checksum algorithm
From: Ricardo Cristian Ramirez <r.cristian.ramirez () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2014 23:26:34 +0200
Hi, First of all, sorry for the delay. I am not the owner of the Acp142 implementation and I was fixing some bugs. I just submitted an enhancement bug in the bugzilla* Thanks everyone * https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10807 2014-12-12 0:13 GMT+02:00 Stig Bjørlykke <stig () bjorlykke org>:
Hi, As Jaap writes, if you send me a sample capture file I will have a look at adding support for the changed checksum. The P_Mul dissector was updated to Version 2.0 Draft 6 in March 2008, but I don't remember which changes was done between Version 2.0 Draft 6 and the released ACP 142(A) from October 2008. Anyway, I will have a look. -- Stig Bjørlykke ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Acp 142 checksum algorithm Ricardo Cristian Ramirez (Dec 10)
- Re: Acp 142 checksum algorithm Jaap Keuter (Dec 11)
- Re: Acp 142 checksum algorithm Stig Bjørlykke (Dec 11)
- Re: Acp 142 checksum algorithm Ricardo Cristian Ramirez (Dec 25)