Re: What Wireshark base version to use for customization

[Graham Bloice <graham.bloice () trihedral com>]

Hi Juan,

We have a Solaris 10 buildbot (
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Solaris%2010%20SPARC)  but
nothing for Solaris 9.

On 10 December 2014 at 17:17, Juan Jose Martin Carrascosa <juanjo () rti com>
wrote:

> Many thanks for the detailed info to everyone.
>
> I already pushed some of my changes (already accepted) to the repository,
> and I will keep doing that in the future.
>
> I have a last question (technical one this time). Do you build Wireshark
> for Solaris (9 and 10)? I am facing issues doing it and I want to know if
> it is supposed to work and the problems are on my side.
>
> Anyone here has done that before manually? Any recommendation on where to
> get the missing packages?
>
> Thanks!
> Juanjo Martin
>
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Graham Bloice <
> graham.bloice () trihedral com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Juan,
> >
> > The GPL FAQ has answers for this type of question (
> > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html, see the section "Distribution
> > of programs released under the GNU licenses") but note that Wireshark is
> > GPL 2.0.
> >
> > On 10 December 2014 at 15:21, Juan Jose Martin Carrascosa <juanjo () rti com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Anders,
> > >
> > > Yes! I was aware of the licensing terms. Is it mandatory to provide the
> > > source in the same bundle as the binary or on the other hand. I can mention
> > > in our documentation that the source code is available, and if they ask for
> > > it, provide it?
> > >
> > > Thanks for the advice regarding the development version.
> > >
> > > Juanjo Martin
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Anders Broman <
> > > anders.broman () ericsson com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >  Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Note that under GPL you are obliged to supply the source code of your
> > > > modifications if you distribute binaries to your customers.
> > > >
> > > > I would use the development version to get the bleeding edge stuff or
> > > > the latest stable if stability is more of an issue.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > >
> > > > Anders
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > *From:* wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org [mailto:
> > > > wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org] *On Behalf Of *Juan Jose Martin
> > > > Carrascosa
> > > > *Sent:* den 10 december 2014 14:39
> > > > *To:* Developer support list for Wireshark
> > > > *Subject:* [Wireshark-dev] What Wireshark base version to use for
> > > > customization
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I have the task to customize and package a custom Wireshark version, so
> > > > we can provide that to our customers.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I wonder what Wireshark version should I use as base. The latest stable
> > > > release or the development release?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Also, I have been looking for the information to package binaries. So
> > > > far, I have found the README files, and the Development webpage
> > > > <http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development>. Any other source of
> > > > information I can take a look at? My plan is to provide binaries for some
> > > > Linux distributions, Solaris, MacOS and Windows.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Juanjo Martin
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ___________________________________________________________________________
> > > > Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> > > > Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> > > > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> > > >              mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org
> > > > ?subject=unsubscribe
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ___________________________________________________________________________
> > > Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> > > Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> > > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> > >              mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org
> > > ?subject=unsubscribe
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Graham Bloice
> > Software Developer
> > Trihedral UK Limited
> >
> >
> > ___________________________________________________________________________
> > Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> > Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> >              mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org
> > ?subject=unsubscribe
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org
> ?subject=unsubscribe



-- 
Graham Bloice
Software Developer
Trihedral UK Limited

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe