Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: "right" git clone address
From: Bálint Réczey <balint () balintreczey hu>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:21:45 +0100
2014-02-20 14:36 GMT+01:00 Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Bálint Réczey <balint () balintreczey hu> wrote:Hi All & Gerald, 2014-02-01 23:04 GMT+01:00 Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>:On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster () gmx de> wrote:As a "follower" of the wireshark code I'm wondering if https://code.wireshark.org/review/wireshark or https://code.wireshark.org/git/wireshark is the right address to build the latest wireshark from source code. (If I understand it correctly this question is similar to "kernel" by Linus versus "kernel-next" by Stephen Rothwell - right ?)No, https://code.wireshark.org/git/wireshark was a read-only mirror of the subversion repo and should be considered dead (I expect Gerald will remove it at some point).I think it would be useful to keep it as a read-only mirror for browsing the code easily.Why? It will have exactly the same contents as the main repository, so there will be no difference between browsing one or the other.
There are probably many links pointing to https://code.wireshark.org/git/wireshark on the Internet and removing the repository will break them. Keeping it updated is trivial OTOH. If the decision is to remove the repo, please redirect links to https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git;a=summary at least. If it stays it needs to be revived with fixed description. Now it says: "Git mirror of the Wireshark Subversion repository" http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Workflow also points to it. @Gerald: To make the Wiki and the repos consistent we need a decision regarding removing or keeping the repo. Thanks, Balint
Gerald, could you please make it updated from Gerrit branches instead of deleting it? Cheers, BalintPlease use only https://code.wireshark.org/review/wireshark___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- "right" git clone address Toralf Förster (Feb 01)
- Re: "right" git clone address Evan Huus (Feb 01)
- Re: "right" git clone address Bálint Réczey (Feb 20)
- Re: "right" git clone address Evan Huus (Feb 20)
- Re: "right" git clone address Bálint Réczey (Feb 20)
- Re: "right" git clone address Gerald Combs (Feb 20)
- Re: "right" git clone address Evan Huus (Feb 20)
- Re: "right" git clone address Guy Harris (Feb 20)
- Re: "right" git clone address Bálint Réczey (Feb 21)
- Re: "right" git clone address Gerald Combs (Feb 21)
- Re: "right" git clone address Bálint Réczey (Feb 20)
- Re: "right" git clone address Evan Huus (Feb 01)