Re: Add a capability to disable/enable a dissector table ?

[Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>]

Sounds like a great idea to me.

Evan

On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Bill Meier <wmeier () newsguy com> wrote:
> It seems to me that it would be nice to be able to disable/enable specific
> dissector and heuristic tables.
>
> For example, this would be useful when investigating tcp level issues
> for which tcp payload dissection is not interesting.
>
> All the different protocols which run over tcp wouldn't need to be disabled
> to just show the payloads as 'data" (and not show things like "malformed"
> because some dissector mistakenly tries to dissect data).
>
>
> Thoughts ? Am i missing something ?
>
> (This might be a nice little project fpr me to learn QT ...).
>
>
> Bill
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe