Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Sample command line workflow with git and gerrit
From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 09:22:20 +0100
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 08:57:36PM -0500, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
On Feb 25, 2014, at 8:44 PM, Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com> wrote:I'm all for consolidating the above information - we just need to decide which of the many places to consolidate *to*. We've been playing musical chairs every few months moving things around from A to B, B to C, and C to A, but never actually getting anywhere.Personally I think the wiki makes the most sense, because none of that stuff is specific to the code version/branch/state; as opposed to the info in most of the docs/READMEs, which are specific to the release. Also we can subscribe to changes of that wiki page, and thereby get notified via email of changes instead of happening to notice a change in a txt/asciidoc file in the code tree. It's really the kind of thing a wiki's for, imo.
-2 a) Develpment documentation must be available for offline work. Folding the development READMEs into the developer guide now that the stuff has moved over to asciidoc would reduce the number of places to two - and the developer's guide is available via web, so there is no problem with creating tutorials and similar stuff in the wiki and then linking to the dg for the details. b) My preferred workflow doesn't require me to use a web browser (except for bugzilla, the wiki and ask - and there is a reason why I don't show much presence in either of these things). My -2 cents. ciao Jörg -- Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Sample command line workflow with git and gerrit Joerg Mayer (Feb 25)
- Re: Sample command line workflow with git and gerrit Hadriel Kaplan (Feb 25)
- Re: Sample command line workflow with git and gerrit Bill Meier (Feb 25)
- Re: Sample command line workflow with git and gerrit Evan Huus (Feb 25)
- Re: Sample command line workflow with git and gerrit Hadriel Kaplan (Feb 25)
- Re: Sample command line workflow with git and gerrit Evan Huus (Feb 25)
- Re: Sample command line workflow with git and gerrit Hadriel Kaplan (Feb 25)
- Re: Sample command line workflow with git and gerrit Evan Huus (Feb 25)
- Re: Sample command line workflow with git and gerrit Alexis La Goutte (Feb 25)
- Re: Sample command line workflow with git and gerrit Guy Harris (Feb 26)
- Re: Sample command line workflow with git and gerrit Joerg Mayer (Feb 26)
- Re: Sample command line workflow with git and gerrit Hadriel Kaplan (Feb 26)
- Re: Sample command line workflow with git and gerrit Bálint Réczey (Feb 26)
- Re: Sample command line workflow with git and gerrit Hadriel Kaplan (Feb 25)
- Re: Sample command line workflow with git and gerrit Joerg Mayer (Feb 26)
- Re: Sample command line workflow with git and gerrit Joerg Mayer (Feb 26)
- Re: Sample command line workflow with git and gerrit Bálint Réczey (Feb 26)
- Re: Sample command line workflow with git and gerrit Evan Huus (Feb 26)
- Re: Sample command line workflow with git and gerrit Bálint Réczey (Feb 26)
- Re: Sample command line workflow with git and gerrit Hadriel Kaplan (Feb 26)
- Re: Sample command line workflow with git and gerrit Joerg Mayer (Feb 26)
- Re: Sample command line workflow with git and gerrit Hadriel Kaplan (Feb 26)