Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Byte ordering for dissectors
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 12:05:24 -0800
On Jan 10, 2014, at 11:26 AM, Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com> wrote:
Perhaps we should add an option to Pcapng to store original-host-endianess as well, ie something that persists in this case?
Doesn't help if you're writing pcap files, or if the code reading the file doesn't know about that pcap-ng option. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Byte ordering for dissectors Michal Labedzki (Jan 10)
- Re: Byte ordering for dissectors Evan Huus (Jan 10)
- Re: Byte ordering for dissectors Evan Huus (Jan 10)
- Re: Byte ordering for dissectors Jakub Zawadzki (Jan 10)
- Re: Byte ordering for dissectors Evan Huus (Jan 10)
- Re: Byte ordering for dissectors Guy Harris (Jan 10)
- Re: Byte ordering for dissectors Guy Harris (Jan 10)
- Re: Byte ordering for dissectors Evan Huus (Jan 10)
- Re: Byte ordering for dissectors Guy Harris (Jan 10)
- Re: Byte ordering for dissectors Evan Huus (Jan 10)