Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: snow3g dissector in violation of GPLv2+
From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:30:11 +0100
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 09:54:48AM +0000, Martin Mathieson wrote:
Re-reading the terms quoted by Guy, my impression is that its the algorithm rather than the reference implementation that the administrative charge gives an organisation access to, so re-implementing would not help.
I don't care about "impressions" about license agreements :-) It's either patented or it isn't. In case it isn't, there's nothing prohibiting us from doing our own implementation if we want to. So if you could provide a sample capture plus the necessary keys, I could try my luck in implementing this (OK, that would be time not spent on cmake stuff, but I can live with that ;-) If it is your own implementation, it would be nice to get at least the .h file into the source, that way I could make a complatible implementation. If we don't do anything, the the include statements and the lib invocations would have to be removed. Ciao Jörg -- Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- snow3g dissector in violation of GPLv2+ Joerg Mayer (Jan 15)
- Re: snow3g dissector in violation of GPLv2+ ronnie sahlberg (Jan 15)
- Re: snow3g dissector in violation of GPLv2+ Pascal Quantin (Jan 15)
- Re: snow3g dissector in violation of GPLv2+ Guy Harris (Jan 15)
- Re: snow3g dissector in violation of GPLv2+ Joerg Mayer (Jan 15)
- Re: snow3g dissector in violation of GPLv2+ Martin Mathieson (Jan 16)
- Re: snow3g dissector in violation of GPLv2+ Joerg Mayer (Jan 16)
- Re: snow3g dissector in violation of GPLv2+ Martin Mathieson (Jan 16)
- Re: snow3g dissector in violation of GPLv2+ Joerg Mayer (Jan 16)
- Re: snow3g dissector in violation of GPLv2+ Guy Harris (Jan 15)