Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: WSUG -> Asciidoc: Fixed docbook/CMakeLists.txt
From: Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 23:29:22 -0400
It should be as simple as git review –d 3139 # make change git commit -a --amend git review There's nothing "special" about changes uploaded by other users, so once you've got the change in a branch (which is what -d does) the rest of the process is pretty standard.
On Jul 20, 2014, at 22:49, Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de> wrote: Hello Gerald, as I'm too dumb to attach a corrected version of the docbook/CMakeLists.txt to https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/3139/ I'm sending it via the list.... Ciao Jörg -- Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. <CMakeLists.txt> ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- WSUG -> Asciidoc: Fixed docbook/CMakeLists.txt Joerg Mayer (Jul 20)
- Re: WSUG -> Asciidoc: Fixed docbook/CMakeLists.txt Evan Huus (Jul 20)