Wireshark mailing list archives
Should checkapi check for "bad" includes?
From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 15:41:14 +0200
Hello, Guy's recent changes to packet-corosync-totemsrp.c make me look at some includes that should not be necessary in dissectors. Is there a valid (design) use for the following includes in the dissectors/ subtree? sys/socket.h netinet/in.h winsock2.h Should other includes be added to this list? Thanks Jörg -- Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Should checkapi check for "bad" includes? Joerg Mayer (Jun 21)