Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: un-encrypted traffic over port 443
From: Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 08:56:15 -0400
Good suggestion, and relatively easy to do. Code for review available at https://code.wireshark.org/review/2693 Evan On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster () gmx de> wrote:
/mew wonders if wireshark should print a warning if a http traffic goes over port 443 (eg a TRAC temporarily configured at that port instead of 80) but is not encrypted, currently those packets are marked as "SSL" but they aren't secure. -- Toralf ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org ?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- un-encrypted traffic over port 443 Toralf Förster (Jun 29)
- Re: un-encrypted traffic over port 443 Evan Huus (Jun 29)
- Re: un-encrypted traffic over port 443 Jakub Zawadzki (Jun 29)
- Re: un-encrypted traffic over port 443 John Sullivan (Jun 29)