Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Gerrit versus Buildbot
From: Bálint Réczey <balint () balintreczey hu>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 20:24:34 -0100
Hi, 2014-03-20 23:11 GMT-01:00 Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>:
On Mar 20, 2014, at 2:24 PM, Chris Kilgour <techie () whiterocker com> wrote:On 03/20/2014 01:07 PM, Gerald Combs wrote:If the build system had open access what would keep someone from uploading a shell script containing a box full of weasels wearing clown shoes?Isn't the same thing true for Jenkins/buildbot spawned from gerrit? Surely the build machines must be limited/sandboxed to prevent the circus from taking over the town.Currently, it's limited to building stuff to which at least one core developer is willing to give +2. That requires human judgement, so it's not as rigid as a hardware/software-implemented sandbox.
Could it please be changed to build changes having at least _+1_ from a Core Developer? +2 has the meaning that it is ready for submitting and using +1 for triggering build-bot would be handy. Cheers, Balint ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Gerrit versus Buildbot Chris Kilgour (Mar 20)
- Re: Gerrit versus Buildbot Gerald Combs (Mar 20)
- Re: Gerrit versus Buildbot Chris Kilgour (Mar 20)
- Re: Gerrit versus Buildbot Guy Harris (Mar 20)
- Re: Gerrit versus Buildbot Bálint Réczey (Mar 21)
- Re: Gerrit versus Buildbot Bálint Réczey (Mar 26)
- Re: Gerrit versus Buildbot Gerald Combs (Mar 27)
- Re: Gerrit versus Buildbot Chris Kilgour (Mar 20)
- Re: Gerrit versus Buildbot Gerald Combs (Mar 20)