Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Profiled dumpcap
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 22:11:15 -0700
On May 8, 2014, at 2:09 PM, Anders Broman <a.broman () bredband net> wrote:
I'm not sure but from the picture there seems to be a bit of overhead per write so if we reduce the fwrites() to 3, hdr-pkdata-footer with hdr and footer being a local buffer[x] it might make some difference.
Presumably you're talking about the writes in pcapng_write_enhanced_packet_block() and putting the padding, options, and trailer into the footer, right? But how much of the overhead is due to multiple calls to write_to_file() and thus to fwrite()? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Profiled dumpcap Anders Broman (May 08)
- Re: Profiled dumpcap Evan Huus (May 08)
- Re: Profiled dumpcap Anders Broman (May 08)
- Re: Profiled dumpcap Anders Broman (May 08)
- Re: Profiled dumpcap Evan Huus (May 08)
- Re: Profiled dumpcap Anders Broman (May 08)
- Re: Profiled dumpcap Evan Huus (May 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Profiled dumpcap Richard Brodie (May 08)
- Re: Profiled dumpcap Anders Broman (May 08)
- Re: Profiled dumpcap Guy Harris (May 08)
- Re: Profiled dumpcap Anders Broman (May 09)
- Re: Profiled dumpcap Anders Broman (May 08)
- Re: Profiled dumpcap Guy Harris (May 08)
- Re: Profiled dumpcap Anders Broman (May 08)