Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: BItfields Larger than 32 Bits


From: Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames-ws () darkjames pl>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 09:26:21 +0200

Hi,

On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 02:19:51PM -0400, Kevin Cox wrote:
I was attempting to dissect a 64 bit bitfield and was wondering what the
best/preferred method was.  I saw a question on ask.wireshark.org[0]
which had a single answer the said to use a text field.

[0]
http://ask.wireshark.org/questions/20599/dissecting-bitfields-larger-than-32-bits

I was wondering if there is a better way to do this. 

Could you check proto_tree_add_split_bits_item_ret_val()?
It looks someone had already this problem.

Cheers,
Jakub.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: