Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Is this a bug in the ipv6 dissector?
From: Alexis La Goutte <alexis.lagoutte () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:21:31 +0100
Hi, On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 4:13 AM, 蓝常珍 <lanczyx () gmail com> wrote:
In the function "dissect_ipv6" of the ipv6 dissector(packet-ipv6.c),the ip6_hdr struct is allocated on the stack,then it's address is passed to tap_queue_packet.I notice that the other dissectors do not look like this. The code snippet of the dissect_ipv6 function,from dev-version 1.99.0: static void dissect_ipv6(tvbuff_t *tvb, packet_info *pinfo, proto_tree *tree) { struct ip6_hdr ipv6; ... tap_queue_packet(ipv6_tap, pinfo, &ipv6); ... }
What the bug ? there is no tap for all dissector...
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Is this a bug in the ipv6 dissector? 蓝常珍 (Nov 27)
- Re: Is this a bug in the ipv6 dissector? Alexis La Goutte (Nov 27)
- Re: Is this a bug in the ipv6 dissector? Evan Huus (Nov 27)
- Re: Is this a bug in the ipv6 dissector? Pascal Quantin (Nov 28)
- Re: Is this a bug in the ipv6 dissector? Evan Huus (Nov 27)
- Re: Is this a bug in the ipv6 dissector? Alexis La Goutte (Nov 27)