Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: enum preferences vs Go Fish
From: Stig Bjørlykke <stig () bjorlykke org>
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2015 20:22:26 +0200
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 1:31 PM, <mmann78 () netscape net> wrote:
Right now there is no way to include a "Decode As" protocol list as a specific preference of a dissector.
If we add this I'm happy with a global Decode As functionality. And it may be an added feature to have this in the preferences for TCP and UDP too. But I can find some issues while trying the p_mul patch: 1. The "Value" and "Type" columns makes no sense for P_Mul (and maybe others). The tooltip does not give any hints. 2. The text in "Current" column is more descriptive in the current P_Mul preferences (not only the protocol short name) 3. It's possible to add more than one entry for P_Mul (in GUI). It seems like only the latest entry is used. This happens when selecting "Decode As..." on a P_Mul entry when already having a preference. I would expect the current entry to be highlighted. 4. My Wireshark does hang after changing the decode-as for P_Mul while having a capture file loaded. I don't know if this is related to your patch. -- Stig Bjørlykke ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: enum preferences vs Go Fish mmann78 (Apr 03)
- Re: enum preferences vs Go Fish Stig Bjørlykke (Apr 04)
- Re: enum preferences vs Go Fish mmann78 (Apr 04)
- Re: enum preferences vs Go Fish Stig Bjørlykke (Apr 04)
- Re: enum preferences vs Go Fish Guy Harris (Apr 04)
- Re: enum preferences vs Go Fish mmann78 (Apr 06)
- Re: enum preferences vs Go Fish Stig Bjørlykke (Apr 06)
- Re: enum preferences vs Go Fish mmann78 (Apr 04)
- Re: enum preferences vs Go Fish Stig Bjørlykke (Apr 04)