Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Wireshark 2 RPC Reassembly Bug?
From: Alexis La Goutte <alexis.lagoutte () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 12:09:22 +0100
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Paul Offord <Paul.Offord () advance7 com> wrote:
Hi, I get the following when reading RPC v2 packets from a pcap file with a snaplen of 96 bytes: C:\Development\Wireshark\epan\reassemble.c:1223: failed assertion "tvb_bytes_exist(tvb, offset, frag_data_len)" I noticed a similar bug report for 1.12.5 – see *Bug 11198 <https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11198>* I’m not sure of the correct way to report this. Do I just add a note to the above bug or should a I create a new one specifically for Wireshark v2. Thanks and regards…Paul
Hi Paul, Like you prefer, it look similar but from last comment from evan say, don't reproduce on trunk/master... Cheers
______________________________________________________________________ This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Advance Seven Ltd. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. Advance Seven Ltd. Registered in England & Wales numbered 2373877 at Endeavour House, Coopers End Lane, Stansted, Essex CM24 1SJ ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com ______________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org ?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Wireshark 2 RPC Reassembly Bug? Paul Offord (Dec 21)
- Re: Wireshark 2 RPC Reassembly Bug? Alexis La Goutte (Dec 21)