Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Wireshark Performance
From: Jim Young <jyoung () gsu edu>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 19:48:13 +0000
On Wednesday, December 2, 2015 14:09 <guy () alum mit edu> On Dec 2, 2015, at 8:11 AM, Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com> wrote:My current hypothesis is commit 74541a9596eead6647c592de9aa46797c2dffa84 but I don't have any files to test with locally.So that one looks as if it might affect *startup* time but not *file loading* time.
I have a trace on a Windows 8 system that appears to replicate the issue. The file loads in ~8 sec for release 2.0.0 and ~25.5 sec on master. The initial load time with when the trace has apparently been flushed from the file I/O system cache adds an additional ~10 sec: ~18.5sec on 2.0.0 vs ~34.5 on master. I'm bisecting now. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: Wireshark Performance, (continued)
- Re: Wireshark Performance Anders Broman (Dec 02)
- Re: Wireshark Performance Anders Broman (Dec 02)
- Re: Wireshark Performance Evan Huus (Dec 02)
- Re: Wireshark Performance Anders Broman (Dec 02)
- Re: Wireshark Performance POZUELO Gloria (BCS/PSD) (Dec 02)
- Re: Wireshark Performance Pascal Quantin (Dec 02)
- Re: Wireshark Performance Anders Broman (Dec 02)
- Re: Wireshark Performance Pascal Quantin (Dec 02)
- Re: Wireshark Performance Evan Huus (Dec 02)
- Re: Wireshark Performance Guy Harris (Dec 02)
- Re: Wireshark Performance Jim Young (Dec 02)
- Re: Wireshark Performance Jim Young (Dec 02)
- Re: Wireshark Performance Evan Huus (Dec 02)
- Re: Wireshark Performance Evan Huus (Dec 02)
- Re: Wireshark Performance POZUELO Gloria (BCS/PSD) (Dec 02)