Re: False positive from the new "Look for incomplete dissectors" function.

[Dario Lombardo <dario.lombardo.ml () gmail com>]

I will push a new small update soon, that should reduce some false
positives (in "frame" dissection).

Then, if I can figure out something new to reduce false positives, I will
push or discuss here my proposals.

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Anders Broman <anders.broman () ericsson com>
wrote:

> *From:* wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org [mailto:
> wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org] *On Behalf Of *Dario Lombardo
> *Sent:* den 13 februari 2015 10:18
> *To:* Developer support list for Wireshark
> *Subject:* Re: [Wireshark-dev] False positive from the new "Look for
> incomplete dissectors" function.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Anders Broman <a.broman58 () gmail com>
> wrote:
>
> > > First thought is, unnecessary processing to satisfy this new
> functionality, which frankly I have my doubts about...
>
> > I have the same feeling. But I can't figure out something else so far.
>
>
>
> Just leave it be then? My main concern was to turn it off and that works
> after a rebuild so for me it’s ok.
>
> Regards
>
> Anders
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org
> ?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe