Re: glib problem with wireshark 1.12.3

[sothy shan <sothy.e98 () gmail com>]

 Hi,

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 6:52 PM, Pascal Quantin
<pascal.quantin () gmail com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2015-02-11 18:18 GMT+01:00 sothy shan <sothy.e98 () gmail com>:
> >  Thanks Jeff. I compiled sucessfully.
> > But lua didnt work.
> > With ./configure --disable-wireshark --with-lua
> > I compiled.
> >
> > tshark -X lua_script:hello.lua
> >
> > Is not working.
>
>
> Is Lua support indicated in tshark -v output? Are you running the locally
> compiled tshark, or a globally installed one (you might run ./tshark instead
> to be sure)?
> Are you running tshark as root or normal user (see
> http://wiki.wireshark.org/Lua for details)?


It worked now. Thanks a lot




> Regards,
> Pascal.
>
> > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws () gmail com>
> > wrote:
> > > On 02/11/15 11:39, sothy shan wrote:
> > > >   Hi!
> > > >
> > > > I tried to install wireshark 1.12.3 in RHEL 6.5.
> > > >
> > > > I am doing following command.
> > > >
> > > > $./configure --disable-wireshark
> > > >
> > > > I got the following error.
> > > >
> > > > checking for GLIB - version >= 2.16.0... no
> > > > *** Could not run GLIB test program, checking why...
> > > > *** The test program failed to compile or link. See the file config.log
> > > > for the
> > > > *** exact error that occured. This usually means GLIB is incorrectly
> > > > installed.
> > > > configure: error: GLib 2.16.0 or later distribution not found.
> > >
> > >
> > > You probably just need to install the glib2-devel package ("yum install
> > > glib2-devel").  RHEL 6 comes with glib 2.26.
> > >
> > > > For Glib, I downloaded glib 2.42.1
> > > > I followed three command as follows:
> > > >
> > > >   $./configure
> > > >
> > > >    $  make
> > > >
> > > >     $ make install
> > >
> > >
> > > That should have worked but it may be a question of where it was
> > > installed
> > > (/usr/local/ ?).  I'd suggest doing a "make uninstall" and then
> > > installing
> > > the glib2-devel package instead.
> > >
> > >
> > > ___________________________________________________________________________
> > > Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list
> > > <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
> > > Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
> > > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
> > >
> > > mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
> >
> > ___________________________________________________________________________
> > Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
> > Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
> > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
> >
> > mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
>
> mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe