Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: mux27010 capture


From: Bill Meier <wmeier () newsguy com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:50:41 -0500

On 1/14/2015 5:26 AM, Lars Poeschel wrote:
I am sorry for messing up the mails thread id, but it is very hard to answer
to a mail where one itself is not the receipient. I am not subscribed to the
mailing list.


I'm not familiar with the protocol but the following may help:

http://www.tcpdump.org/linktypes/LINKTYPE_MUX27010.html

Thanks for that. I did not know this. If I understand this right, this does
not comply with the 3gpp specification, but instead a special siemens/cinterion
variant of the protocol that is not compatible with the original 3gpp
protocol.
It would be great to note that fact somewhere in the wireshark code and/or in
the wireshark doc.

(Done, already...   :) )

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
            mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: