Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Custom cmake files
From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 12:53:55 +0100
Hello Anders, On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 09:50:27AM +0000, Anders Broman wrote:
Commit https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git;a=commitdiff;h=3b46e6eaf61a29f9bd8f8c162caa54cc2ea81fe2 is causing me problems. Are you opposed to changing back the file name to CMakeListsCustom.txt<https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git;a=blob;f=epan/CMakeListsCustom.txt;h=d1f41d62ab11221332d26a56a04b470426de65ab;hb=84629f43cb6c19ca2e0e512ac2429584925be896> ? That makes it easy to have the files included in a tarball and makes it possible for me to Use the same file names in my custom build as in the standard one. I do not want to carry changes to "standard" files if it can be avoided. As it stands I would have To have my own Makefile.am or add some sort of hack to it. I think it would be much cleaner just changing the file names back.
I'm not sure I understand what you are asking: If you want to rename the CMakeListsCustom.txt.example back to CMakeListsCustom.txt then yes, I'm really opposed to it, because in that case I don't see any advantage in modifying the ...Custom... file instead of changing the original CMakeLists.txt file. My motivation for this change was to avoid haing a modified *checked* in file in my source tree while doing dissector development. How about adding a variable in the custom file that allows additional files to be pickt up for packaging? Ciao Jörg -- Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: Custom cmake files Joerg Mayer (Jan 28)