Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Autogenerated files in source tree [Was: asn2wrs problem]


From: mmann78 () netscape net
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 18:49:53 -0400


+1.
 
I know the ASN.1 dissectors can be generated on all platforms, it's a few of the others I'm worried about (DCE/RPC)
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>
To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Sent: Thu, Jun 25, 2015 5:38 pm
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Autogenerated files in source tree [Was: asn2wrs problem]


On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de> wrote:
On
Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 02:24:05PM -0700, Pascal Quantin wrote:
Yeah that's my
fault: I did some API change yesterday and did not realize
that CREDSSP was
an autogenerated dissector. I will fix this in a few
minutes.

OK,
which brings me back to the topic that we should have as few autogenerated

dissectors in our source tree as possible. I don't think the additional
compile
time qualifies as a counter argument, and phython is required to
build Wireshark
as well.

So why keep doing that? If it's OK, I'd like
to do a PoC patch for asn1.

I'd be happy to see that, I tried once but my
build-system skills were
not up to it.



 
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: