Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: [Wireshark-commits] master e16500e: Fix check for NUL at the end of a string.
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 15:26:45 -0700
On May 12, 2015, at 3:13 PM, Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com> wrote:
Argh, one of these days I will learn to just put parentheses in rather than taking guesses at C operator precedence :(
Yeah, the rule I've found works best for me is "if you aren't certain, throw parentheses at it". ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] master e16500e: Fix check for NUL at the end of a string. Evan Huus (May 12)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] master e16500e: Fix check for NUL at the end of a string. Guy Harris (May 12)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] master e16500e: Fix check for NUL at the end of a string. Bálint Réczey (May 12)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] master e16500e: Fix check for NUL at the end of a string. Graham Bloice (May 13)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] master e16500e: Fix check for NUL at the end of a string. Bálint Réczey (May 12)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] master e16500e: Fix check for NUL at the end of a string. Guy Harris (May 12)