Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Petri-Dish circumvention breaks daily-build


From: Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 08:30:14 +0200

Le 10 sept. 2015 8:00 AM, "Roland Knall" <rknall () gmail com> a écrit :

Hi

In our company we have our own Wireshark tools and plugins, which use the
main wireshark repository. To ensure that those do not break (and if they
break we can fix them in due time), we synchronize with the Wireshark repo
every night and build it with our own tools on Windows and Linux.

And nearly every other week or so, the build breaks because of patches
introducing issues, which would have been caught by Petri-Dish. The latest
being a NFS patch (#10429), where a variable is being used uninitialized.
There where many patches to NFS, and the top-most one only was being sent
to petri-dish, but not rebased first, which meant it was not checking the
code of it's predecessors but only the one of itself.

Now if I submit code, it correctly and rightly so must pass the
Petri-Dish step to ensure cross-plattform compatibility for building at
least. I have nothing against that, in fact, I really prefer it, becuase
every now and then you can overlook something.

But all (I checked the last 7) the breaks in our build-system happened,
because a core-developer submitted a patch without petri-dish. I do not
think it is fair, that non-core-developers are being sent through an extra
step and core's can circumvent this step. In my opinion it should be a
necessity for everyone.

regards,
Roland



Hi Roland,

When I sent the NFS serie to Petri Dish I took what I thought was the
latest NFS patch of the 14 patchs queue. So Petri Dish should have tested
all of them. Looks like I got confused at some point (I do not find Gerrit
UI really intuitive for long series) as the error appeared despite my
attempt and I'm sorry about that. Note that those patches were not from a
non core developer, so I do not agree with your statement that this is a
core vs non core extra step.
I agree with you that we should improve in this area. But we are far better
than 2 years ago where the tree was broken almost every day. And we try to
fix failure as soon as possible, but it can get delayed due to real life.
Moreover for now Petri Dish just runs a x86 Linux and Windows bots. It
means that some errors seen on other platforms will not be caught.

Pascal.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: