Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Remove duplication for resolved addresses


From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:31:59 -0700


On Sep 10, 2015, at 1:05 PM, Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin () gmail com> wrote:

Just a random thought (as I'm far from being a script expert). In case only one of the 2 IP address is resolved, 
would it be harder to parse?
  Src: 192.0.2.1, Dst: localhost (127.0.0.1)

Is it harder to parse that or

        <packet> 
        <section>15</section>
        <section>7.646900</section>
        <section>192.0.2.1</section>
        <section>127.0.0.1</section>
        <section>{protocol}</section>
        <section>{info}</section>
        </packet>

(PSML) or

        192.0.2.1,127.0.0.1 

(-T fields -E separator=, -e _ws.col.Source -e _ws.col.Destination)?

Perhaps the default packet detail output should be oriented towards being read by humans, with the output of -T psml, 
-T ldml, and -T fields being what you use if you want it to be read by software?
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: