Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: checkapi
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 14:48:45 -0700
On Apr 18, 2016, at 2:16 PM, Graham Bloice <graham.bloice () trihedral com> wrote:
What should we do about the lex files? Guy's last comment on this issue was Some "generated" code is "generated" by copying it from the .l/.lemon/.y/etc. files; the problem is that we'd like to check that code, but not code that's actually *generated*.
Can we make checkapi.pl capable of reading .l and .y files? If so, we should process them, not the generated files. (Lemon is less important, as we have our own fork of Lemon and can change it, although we may not want to make Wireshark-specific changes, so it might also be useful to have checkapi.pl capable of processing them as well.) ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: checkapi, (continued)
- Re: checkapi Jeff Morriss (Apr 11)
- Re: checkapi Jeff Morriss (Apr 11)
- Re: checkapi Graham Bloice (Apr 11)
- Re: checkapi Jeff Morriss (Apr 11)
- Re: checkapi Graham Bloice (Apr 11)
- Re: checkapi Jeff Morriss (Apr 11)
- Re: checkapi Jeff Morriss (Apr 11)
- Re: checkapi Jeff Morriss (Apr 11)
- Re: checkapi Graham Bloice (Apr 11)
- Re: checkapi Graham Bloice (Apr 18)
- Re: checkapi Guy Harris (Apr 18)
- Re: checkapi Graham Bloice (Apr 19)
- Re: checkapi Jeff Morriss (Apr 19)
- Re: checkapi Graham Bloice (Apr 21)
- Re: checkapi Jeff Morriss (Apr 21)
- Re: checkapi Graham Bloice (Apr 22)
- Re: checkapi Jeff Morriss (Apr 22)
- Re: checkapi Evan Huus (Apr 22)
- Re: checkapi Graham Bloice (Apr 22)