Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: extcap.c does not build on SUSE 11.3. g_spawn_check_exit_status requires glib 2.34


From: Roland Knall <rknall () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 17:02:00 +0200

Hi

No, I've uploaded a new patch to gerrit (
https://code.wireshark.org/review/16827), which removes the need for this
function. Just fyi, the min glib version to be supported is 2.14.0, and
although I'd appreciate a discussion to change that in the future, this
patch is a pretty simple fix.

regards
Roland


On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Dario Lombardo <dario.lombardo.ml () gmail com
wrote:

This call exists from glib 2.34. We should add this version as minimum
requirement to build extcap.

On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Anders Broman <anders.broman () ericsson com
wrote:

Hi,

I get

extcap.c:842: undefined reference to `g_spawn_check_exit_status' on SUSe
11.3 with top of trunk.



Perhaps we should not build extcap on such an old system?



Regards

Anders


___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org
?subject=unsubscribe



___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org
?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: