Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Patch to fix LANforge protcol.


From: Brent Lovelace <brent.lovelace () candelatech com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 15:04:47 -0700



On 16-06-09 02:33 PM, Pascal Quantin wrote:

Hi Brent,

Le 9 juin 2016 23:20, "Brent Lovelace" <brent.lovelace () candelatech com <mailto:brent.lovelace () candelatech com>> a écrit :
>
> The attached patch fixes a bug we noticed in wireshark.

The change was made because tvb_memeql is known to be slow.
What is the issue exactly? Related to endianness preventing to identify the magic?
Could you a share a pcap file demonstrating the issue?

Best regards,
Pascal.



___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
              mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Hey Pascal,

I've attached a pcap file with LANforge UDP packets. The protocol in these packets should be LANforge but they decode as UDP. The patch is intended to fix the protocol decoding issue.

Thanks,
Brent

--
Brent Lovelace
Candela Technologies
brent.lovelace () candelatech com
Office: 360-380-1618

Attachment: lanforge-udp.pcap
Description:

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: