Re: Removing ADNS

[João Valverde <joao.valverde () tecnico ulisboa pt>]

On 18-03-2016 23:00, Pascal Quantin wrote:
> Le 18 mars 2016 10:02 PM, "João Valverde"
> <joao.valverde () tecnico ulisboa pt
> <mailto:joao.valverde () tecnico ulisboa pt>> a écrit :
>  >
>  > I pushed a change removing ADNS support. If anyone depends on this:
>  >
>  > https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/14519/
>  >
>
> By curiosity, is ADNS support an issue?


500 hundred less lines of useless bit-rotting code to maintain. ADNS 
upstream seems dead and c-ares is superior in every respect.

I should also note that ADNS is GPLv3+, so not suitable for Wireshark.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
            mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe