Re: Wireshark ready for industrial usage

[Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>]

On May 26, 2016, at 3:38 PM, Thomas Wiens <th.wiens () gmx de> wrote:

> But the Profinet dissector is still a plugin, I don't know if it's
> possible to write a tap (which I think is needed) for a dissector which
> comes as a plugin.

Not only is it possible, it's even possible for a statistics tap to be a plugin.  It'll even work with both Wireshark 
and TShark if you can use any of the APIs provided to construct statistics tables (rather than writing your own GUI 
code).
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe