Re: Enable monitor mode column in Wireshark GUI for Windows

[Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>]

On May 15, 2016, at 10:49 AM, Yang Luo <hsluoyb () gmail com> wrote:

> On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu> wrote:
> > On May 9, 2016, at 9:31 AM, Yang Luo <hsluoyb () gmail com> wrote:
> >
> > > I want to enable monitor mode column for Windows. Based on this post: 
> > > https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201601/msg00002.html, we need to undefine the HAVE_PCAP_OPEN macro 
> > > when building Wireshark for Windows.
> >
> > No.
> >
> > It "means that dumpcap needs to be changed to use those APIs on local adapters if they're available, regardless of 
> > whether pcap_open() is available, and to use pcap_open() *only* for remote adapters."
> >
> > And that's already been done in the master branch.  See caputils/capture-pcap-util.c and caputils/capture-wpcap.c.
>
> I saw these 3 commits as below (I think these are what you mean by "that's already been done in the master branch"?): 
>
> 1) Add opiton to configure HAVE_PCAP_CREATE
> https://github.com/wireshark/wireshark/commit/4a408c9641cd5e5a62064d4e4f545f7fe38b7dbb
> 2) [WINPCAP] First step to be able to use pcap_create()
> https://github.com/wireshark/wireshark/commit/1658a3520f79d63217b47015b244a82bd55d3f34
> 3) Set both HAVE_PCAP_CREATE and HAVE_PCAP_OPEN.
> https://github.com/wireshark/wireshark/commit/b2bf9e3306d34987dfb7928964931088c2224b92

No, I also mean, for example:

4) Move more capture device handling to the caputils library.
https://github.com/wireshark/wireshark/commit/ba3aa03dcfb49a3bb2b090b864f1311fa4ecbc0e

> These commits happen in 7 Jan, and Wireshark 2.0.3 which I use is released on Apr 23. So I think these commits work 
> for 2.0.3.

The *date* of a commit doesn't matter - a commit done on the master branch, after the 2.0 branch was created, won't be 
in any 2.0.x release, even if it's done before the release.  It would have to be done on the 2.0 branch in order to be 
in a 2.0 release.

ba3aa03dcfb49a3bb2b090b864f1311fa4ecbc0e was *not* done on the 2.0 branch, only on the master branch, so it's not in 
*any* 2.0.x release.

As Alexis said, you should be using the master branch, not the 2.0 branch, to test your work.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe